1
00:00:11,090 --> 00:00:13,680
So in this lecture, we will be studying Arch.

2
00:00:14,180 --> 00:00:15,750
So why do we call this arch?

3
00:00:16,370 --> 00:00:21,130
Well, Arch stands for Auto Regressive Conditional Heteros Cadastre City.

4
00:00:21,740 --> 00:00:24,260
You can see how this might be a bit difficult to say.

5
00:00:24,440 --> 00:00:26,300
Thus, we simply call it arch.

6
00:00:27,050 --> 00:00:29,200
OK, so let's try to make sense of this name.

7
00:00:29,990 --> 00:00:33,780
Firstly, we've seen that stock returns are heteros get stick.

8
00:00:34,190 --> 00:00:36,780
This means that their variance changes over time.

9
00:00:37,490 --> 00:00:41,180
This is clear because sometimes it's high, but sometimes it's low.

10
00:00:41,960 --> 00:00:47,780
Compare this to completely random idy noise, which would be used to generate a random walk.

11
00:00:48,230 --> 00:00:52,400
We would call this homo sadistic because the variance is the same over time.

12
00:00:52,940 --> 00:00:54,200
Hetero means different.

13
00:00:54,350 --> 00:00:55,500
Homo means same.

14
00:00:56,870 --> 00:00:59,100
OK, so that's why it's hetero sadistic.

15
00:00:59,420 --> 00:01:00,660
What about conditional?

16
00:01:01,520 --> 00:01:07,310
Well, we can see that not only does the variance of the return a change over time, it seems to be

17
00:01:07,310 --> 00:01:09,430
dependent on nearby values.

18
00:01:09,890 --> 00:01:15,440
That is, when we see large returns, they tend to be surrounded by other large returns.

19
00:01:15,830 --> 00:01:20,130
When we see small returns, they tend to be surrounded by other small returns.

20
00:01:20,570 --> 00:01:26,720
So it would make sense to build a model where the current variance is conditioned on previous values.

21
00:01:27,320 --> 00:01:32,870
Furthermore, since it's conditioned on the previous values of the same time series, it's also auto

22
00:01:32,870 --> 00:01:33,560
regressive.

23
00:01:34,220 --> 00:01:39,830
OK, so that explains why we call this auto regressive conditional heteros cadastre.

24
00:01:40,460 --> 00:01:45,110
Basically, it means we're going to build a model for the variance of a time series which can change

25
00:01:45,110 --> 00:01:48,590
over time and its value depends on previous values.

26
00:01:53,150 --> 00:01:58,690
OK, so before we even begin to look at Gargash, let's recall how we typically model a time series.

27
00:01:59,120 --> 00:02:01,220
Most models we build have this form.

28
00:02:01,820 --> 00:02:08,300
We say that Y of T is equal to some function of past values of Y and some model parameters, plus some

29
00:02:08,300 --> 00:02:09,860
noise epsilon of T.

30
00:02:10,890 --> 00:02:15,920
OK, so normally Epsilon of T is assumed to be something like Gaussian white noise.

31
00:02:16,340 --> 00:02:22,940
We typically assume that it's a zero and its variance is constant and that we cannot predict it because

32
00:02:22,940 --> 00:02:23,360
of this.

33
00:02:23,360 --> 00:02:28,160
Our attention typically turns to the first part of this equation, which is what I've called F.

34
00:02:28,970 --> 00:02:34,880
Basically our job is to find theta, which determines that, well, in this section things are a bit

35
00:02:34,880 --> 00:02:35,520
different.

36
00:02:36,020 --> 00:02:40,150
Now we are not concerned with F, but rather we are concerned with Epsilon.

37
00:02:40,820 --> 00:02:44,210
So all throughout this course we've been trying to build a model for F.

38
00:02:44,570 --> 00:02:46,730
Now we are going to build a model for Epsilon.

39
00:02:51,330 --> 00:02:56,820
So another way to think of this is that a time series can be modeled by two separate models are and

40
00:02:56,820 --> 00:03:00,810
Gargash Arima is used to model the mean of the Time series.

41
00:03:01,170 --> 00:03:06,990
This part is assumed to have zero variance, on the other hand, is used to model the variance of the

42
00:03:06,990 --> 00:03:07,860
TIME series.

43
00:03:08,220 --> 00:03:10,140
This part is assumed to have zero mean.

44
00:03:10,830 --> 00:03:16,170
When you put these together, you get both the mean and the variance model by two separate components.

45
00:03:20,750 --> 00:03:25,610
So another thing to consider is why should we build an auto regressive model to begin with?

46
00:03:26,090 --> 00:03:29,160
We'd like to have a bit more evidence to motivate this decision.

47
00:03:30,350 --> 00:03:35,990
So, as you recall, one tool that we use to determine the order of an auto regressive model is the

48
00:03:35,990 --> 00:03:37,670
Akef or Sieff.

49
00:03:38,300 --> 00:03:42,190
Now, recall what happens when you take the akef of stock returns.

50
00:03:42,710 --> 00:03:48,680
We can think of a stock log returns as epsilon of T, since we've seen that in A1 process is often the

51
00:03:48,680 --> 00:03:51,680
best Arima model for a stock price time series.

52
00:03:52,250 --> 00:03:58,100
So if we fit in, I want to the log price then the epsilons or just the log returns.

53
00:03:59,090 --> 00:04:01,190
OK, so what does the AKF look like?

54
00:04:02,030 --> 00:04:05,640
Well, we've seen that there are zero statistically significant lags.

55
00:04:06,020 --> 00:04:11,870
The same thing happens when we look at the PSA and also recall this is the same thing we would see with

56
00:04:11,870 --> 00:04:14,480
completely random Gaussian white noise.

57
00:04:14,840 --> 00:04:19,100
And as such, we've seen that stock returns are very close to a random walk.

58
00:04:23,910 --> 00:04:29,910
But something interesting happens when we plot the Akef for the square of the log returns, when we

59
00:04:29,910 --> 00:04:34,260
do this, we find that there are, in fact, statistically significant lags.

60
00:04:34,740 --> 00:04:40,170
This suggests that the square of the log returns are predictable using pass values.

61
00:04:40,860 --> 00:04:45,540
Now, at this point, you'll just have to take my word that this is true, but we will be demonstrating

62
00:04:45,540 --> 00:04:46,460
this in code.

63
00:04:46,890 --> 00:04:52,170
Otherwise, if you're eager to observe this yourself and as an exercise, please try it on your own.
