0
1
00:00:00,180 --> 00:00:03,510
If we want that these devices can communicate with each other.
1

2
00:00:03,780 --> 00:00:05,550
They must use the same protocols.
2

3
00:00:06,030 --> 00:00:13,440
And, we are used to representing these protocols on a graph along two axis with the bitrate as the ordinate
3

4
00:00:13,830 --> 00:00:18,750
with bit per second as unit and the abscissa represents the range.
4

5
00:00:19,500 --> 00:00:24,480
There range is the distance at which none device can communicate with another device,
5

6
00:00:24,510 --> 00:00:27,870
or with a gateway. To represent all this protocol,
6

7
00:00:28,380 --> 00:00:34,470
we will compare them with each other and we'll start with a very well known one, which is the Wi-Fi.
7

8
00:00:35,130 --> 00:00:37,860
In terms of range, we're about 100 meters.
8

9
00:00:38,190 --> 00:00:43,740
That is to say that we're in the range of a house or an apartment, considering that there is attenuation
9

10
00:00:43,740 --> 00:00:51,510
in the walls, and regarding the bitrate, we're around 100 megabits per second.
10

11
00:00:52,350 --> 00:00:54,710
But there are many Wi-Fi standards.
11

12
00:00:54,720 --> 00:01:01,350
So we start on relatively low bitrate values, and with the latest standards, we are much more than
12

13
00:01:01,440 --> 00:01:03,120
100 megabits per second.
13

14
00:01:03,960 --> 00:01:11,100
Then, another protocol that is widely used in the world of the Internet of Things is Bluetooth.
14

15
00:01:11,130 --> 00:01:15,180
The Bluetooth, in terms of range, it's much less than the Wi-Fi.
15

16
00:01:15,690 --> 00:01:22,320
We're rather on a range of about ten meters and in terms of bitrate, we're more around one gigabit per second.
16

17
00:01:22,320 --> 00:01:24,840
In Bluetooth,
17

18
00:01:24,870 --> 00:01:29,640
What is interesting is that the latest standards are more focused on low power consumption.
18

19
00:01:30,270 --> 00:01:35,970
That's why Bluetooth has been renamed BLE for Bluetooth Low Energy in the latest generation.
19

20
00:01:36,990 --> 00:01:43,430
Then if we continue on this graph, we can stay in the world of home automation with Zigbee and for
20

21
00:01:43,440 --> 00:01:47,130
Zigbee we're more or less with a range of 100 meters.
21

22
00:01:48,210 --> 00:01:54,380
The difference between Wi-Fi and Zigbee is that the bitrate is lower and we are talking of a value around
22

23
00:01:54,390 --> 00:01:55,710
one kilobits per second.
23

24
00:01:56,760 --> 00:02:01,620
Zigbee is often used in home automation for connecting switches, for example.
24

25
00:02:02,340 --> 00:02:11,580
Then we can use the network operators such as 2G then 3G, 4G and 5G with bitrates from low to very high
25

26
00:02:11,580 --> 00:02:17,130
value under future 5G. 2G and 3G will disappear in the near future.
26

27
00:02:17,670 --> 00:02:26,100
And we expect that the 2G service will be stopped by 2025 and for the 3G will be more around 2028, depending
27

28
00:02:26,100 --> 00:02:27,750
on how fast 5G is deployed.
28

29
00:02:28,470 --> 00:02:32,670
So, now we're going to move on the other part of the graph.
29

30
00:02:33,720 --> 00:02:38,880
And on that part, we are dealing with very low bitrate and very short range.
30

31
00:02:39,300 --> 00:02:46,230
Here we find a very well known protocol, NFC that we use for contactless payment or access authorization,
31

32
00:02:46,230 --> 00:02:46,860
for example.
32

33
00:02:47,010 --> 00:02:53,940
And finally, we will go to the right part of the graph to find protocols with very high range but with
33

34
00:02:53,940 --> 00:02:55,320
very low bitrate.
34

35
00:02:56,190 --> 00:02:59,820
And that's where we'll find LPWAN for Low Power WAN.
35

36
00:03:00,340 --> 00:03:09,750
We will find here, protocol such as Sigfox, LoRa, along with the other operating network like NB-IoT
36

37
00:03:10,740 --> 00:03:12,300
and then LTE-M.
37

38
00:03:15,270 --> 00:03:19,500
So when we look at this graph, there is something that is surprising.
38

39
00:03:19,710 --> 00:03:26,190
It's that if I consider myself as a user, I would like to have both high speed and long range, which
39

40
00:03:26,190 --> 00:03:31,800
means that all the protocol that are on the top right of this diagram would be better than the other.
40

41
00:03:32,730 --> 00:03:36,570
And all those that are the bottom left would be useless.
41

42
00:03:37,410 --> 00:03:41,130
This is obviously not true for several reasons.
42

43
00:03:42,000 --> 00:03:48,510
First, if we take the case of NFC, for example, NFC has a very particular characteristic, which is
43

44
00:03:48,510 --> 00:03:53,070
security, and when you make a contactless payment, you don't want long range at all.
44

45
00:03:53,220 --> 00:03:58,260
On the contrary, you really want the range to be as low as possible for security reasons.
45

46
00:03:58,440 --> 00:04:02,310
So having a short range in that case was a feature that we were looking for.
46

47
00:04:02,670 --> 00:04:09,930
For the others, we could wonder why Bluetooth and Zigbee are interesting when with 5G we can have higher speed
47

48
00:04:09,930 --> 00:04:10,410
and range.
48

49
00:04:10,760 --> 00:04:15,930
Well, in fact, to be able to compare them properly, we should add a new axis here.
49

50
00:04:16,560 --> 00:04:19,350
And this axis is the power consumption.
50

51
00:04:19,680 --> 00:04:22,870
If we look again at NFC, what is the consumption?
51

52
00:04:22,890 --> 00:04:23,730
It's zero.
52

53
00:04:24,330 --> 00:04:24,930
Why is that?
53

54
00:04:25,110 --> 00:04:28,890
Because the card we use, they are powered by a magnetic field.
54

55
00:04:29,190 --> 00:04:32,080
So there is no battery used during the data transmission.
55

56
00:04:32,100 --> 00:04:35,640
And on the other hand, how can we compare Wi-Fi with LPWAN?
56

57
00:04:35,760 --> 00:04:38,190
The first advantage is the range, as we've seen before.
57

58
00:04:38,550 --> 00:04:43,680
But overall, it's again, the power consumption that we need to take into consideration.
58

59
00:04:43,740 --> 00:04:49,740
So that's why we have a whole bunch of protocol here for which we consider that the bitrate was not
59

60
00:04:49,740 --> 00:04:51,360
the most important property.
60

61
00:04:51,870 --> 00:04:58,050
But on the other hand, we wish to have a much higher range and also a very, very low consumption.
61

62
00:04:59,190 --> 00:05:03,960
In that course, we are going to focus mainly on LoRa, this protocol here.
62

63
00:05:05,460 --> 00:05:08,250
And now that we've understood what is LoRa compared to the others.
63

64
00:05:08,520 --> 00:05:11,700
We're going to focus on the frequency band at lower values.
