WEBVTT

00:01.410 --> 00:01.980
Hi there.

00:02.700 --> 00:10.020
In this election, we see Serguei carry action against one of Britain's leading grandmasters for many,

00:10.020 --> 00:15.480
many years, Michael Adams, who, by the way, around the same age as Ms.

00:15.510 --> 00:21.240
I saw him first hand dominates like British chess, British junior chess at the time.

00:21.810 --> 00:26.280
And his amazing positional style is absolutely an inspiration.

00:27.930 --> 00:34.670
There was one particular grandmaster game where he completely crushed, in my view, the opponent positionally.

00:34.680 --> 00:35.810
And this is that game.

00:36.150 --> 00:37.500
It's in the London system.

00:38.130 --> 00:51.140
So Soga come out and play defo 96 from at 45 every six nights at C five, Seefried 96.

00:51.150 --> 00:52.520
So so far so good.

00:52.920 --> 01:02.100
Both sides have harmony between their pieces and --'s might be to bishop desex the bishop drops pank

01:02.490 --> 01:11.610
Adams councils bishop defraying these things and now one plays 95 Bishop Bee seven and now efore.

01:11.640 --> 01:18.510
So generally this is for to be an interesting idea to kind of go from one system into a kind of stone

01:18.510 --> 01:22.860
wall with the bishop on Jeoffrey rather than see one.

01:24.690 --> 01:29.100
Fundamentally, though, there is an Achilles heel in White's position.

01:29.100 --> 01:35.580
In doing this, there is a potential for a complete lack of harmony between especially the Donetsk membership

01:36.030 --> 01:36.780
and the rest of them.

01:36.780 --> 01:42.390
-- It's a dangerous strategic danger to have a very, very bad bishop.

01:43.140 --> 01:50.310
And this game occurs to me as one of the more vivid examples in the back of my mind about bad bishops.

01:50.790 --> 01:58.290
And we see ASMs pursuing quite a classic strategy, which, OK, he didn't invent.

01:58.290 --> 02:03.090
There's evidence of this in earlier games of Tameem Chozen back in the 60s.

02:03.420 --> 02:05.730
It's very difficult to invent anything absolutely new.

02:06.180 --> 02:15.660
But against this kind of setup, blackmail plays 97, reinforcing a full control, making sure that

02:15.670 --> 02:20.370
if don't you know, happening any time soon, Queensferry now might have five.

02:21.750 --> 02:23.160
Putting pressure on White Center.

02:23.340 --> 02:25.280
We see Bishop after Bishop S7.

02:25.710 --> 02:32.700
On the point of this, Bishop A7 is to really get a boyens on the position and leave this bishop as

02:32.700 --> 02:35.430
a prisoner within its own pawn chain.

02:36.660 --> 02:46.080
We see G4, Ninety-Six, G5 and now at night Effy for any hopes of a white attack are getting reduced

02:46.080 --> 02:46.470
here.

02:47.370 --> 02:53.400
The harmony is not so good in White's position, especially in this Bishop and Closed-End like this.

02:54.300 --> 02:57.360
Bad bishops are also, it seems to be a major points.

02:57.780 --> 03:02.100
When neural networks arose and started beating the strong, strongest chess of the world.

03:02.610 --> 03:10.260
Quite often they understand that a bad bishop is a great example of a lack of harmony between power

03:10.260 --> 03:16.160
and structure and pieces and what kind of dynamically exposed that even against the strongest engines

03:16.180 --> 03:17.400
the world here.

03:17.400 --> 03:18.450
This by Bishop.

03:19.140 --> 03:20.700
Yeah, it's a major issue.

03:20.700 --> 03:26.610
And why is a adventurists and casting queen aside, however?

03:26.970 --> 03:33.690
Because then Kingside is impossible right now because of 962 and it would be a lot of further hassle

03:34.800 --> 03:36.030
to do anything about that.

03:36.030 --> 03:38.310
Giving up the only good bishop.

03:38.340 --> 03:42.330
The position is out of the question of bishop takes evil.

03:42.330 --> 03:48.570
I mean, black would have great options and this bishop could be dangerous on this diagonal, on the

03:48.570 --> 03:52.830
A6 to EF1 diagonal, but black would be dominant in this position.

03:53.490 --> 03:55.710
So White Castles Queen side.

03:57.120 --> 04:06.840
And then we seek for Bishop Caesar and now be five Queen Aintree and now pressure on White's pawn chain

04:06.840 --> 04:15.870
with before we see Knight takes for details e form if 1984.

04:16.200 --> 04:25.770
This is less precise it seems Bishop Yone and here Rook Jiwon Y actually might get something a reasonable

04:25.770 --> 04:26.730
position at least.

04:26.730 --> 04:27.120
Yeah.

04:29.370 --> 04:32.670
So this is the most accurate play details easeful.

04:33.390 --> 04:34.830
We see Bishop Iwon.

04:35.550 --> 04:39.180
And the point here now is Bishop DFI.

04:39.180 --> 04:42.930
This facilitates a major front of the frame.

04:43.590 --> 04:47.520
So there is great harmony in Black's possession much more than once.

04:48.720 --> 04:52.860
And you know this threat of before Express's great options.

04:55.390 --> 05:02.440
We see I mean, for me, this is also reminiscent of a classic game where Adams actually being spun

05:02.440 --> 05:07.120
off in a similar game, especially five similar kind of positional moves that this bishop.

05:07.450 --> 05:08.620
Well, it seems bad.

05:08.620 --> 05:12.810
It's got and she got that lovely the five square that Adams has given to her.

05:13.330 --> 05:16.810
So the harmony really, really impresses me.

05:16.810 --> 05:25.690
Here we see Ruchi won't be free, takes seats, should be won, and now F5 is played.

05:26.200 --> 05:32.080
So Black's position, I would say, has very nice harmony compared to White's position.

05:34.340 --> 05:39.590
And why is a major like grandmaster about championship, you know, playing in one of the world championships?

05:40.730 --> 05:42.090
So we have details.

05:42.140 --> 05:44.530
Bishop Thanks, Rotifer.

05:46.190 --> 05:48.950
But now this other square is used at 5:00.

05:51.770 --> 05:54.800
We see here kindie, too.

05:54.830 --> 05:59.060
This is a very miserable position for white, tied up in knots.

06:00.830 --> 06:07.790
And now Queen 85, there's actually a square which is really kind of weak for white hair that Adams

06:07.790 --> 06:12.680
identifies because White's pieces are so locked up here.

06:13.190 --> 06:15.860
The bishop and this bishop, they're kind of locked up.

06:16.820 --> 06:23.360
Adams kind of gets a free hands even, you know, just just try this kind of thing with A1 and B2.

06:23.810 --> 06:30.860
We see King Itou, but now first taking white, basically one of White's better pieces, Bishop 65.

06:31.370 --> 06:34.520
So White really hasn't got too much counterplay.

06:35.000 --> 06:40.610
And if you have a kind of situation like this where the opponent minimize the counterplay, then you

06:40.610 --> 06:48.410
could look out for squares which they really can't handle very, very well, kind of, you know, unattended

06:48.410 --> 06:54.560
to squares or squares you can infiltrate, infiltrate via without worrying so much about giving them

06:54.560 --> 06:57.590
time to, like, do something nasty to your Kingside.

06:58.130 --> 06:59.900
So Adams has such a position.

06:59.900 --> 07:03.650
Rook ADHD is played.

07:03.650 --> 07:11.750
We see kafta if rook G one here then in fact Bishop C for check and Rook takes the one out.

07:12.080 --> 07:21.050
So King AFTA but now yeah this lunging move trying to break up spoon's have been to commit to that.

07:21.050 --> 07:23.120
Now there's also King's safety issues.

07:23.660 --> 07:27.560
White's position has really unharmonious and disconnected.

07:28.160 --> 07:31.490
We see Bishop D to Bishop CIFOR.

07:34.320 --> 07:35.710
With that bishop pinned to the rope.

07:35.740 --> 07:42.990
Now this is getting really nasty, Queen H5 and now, yeah, Beita is just there for the taking about

07:42.990 --> 07:50.140
any real problem and why he's just humiliated her with this tactic now, which is game ending.

07:50.430 --> 07:53.750
I wonder if you can spot it if I give you five cents for the.

07:59.950 --> 08:01.900
OK, it's real tasty, too.

08:03.550 --> 08:07.660
Yeah, the game ends here because if Rook takes the two, there's Quincy one Jack.

08:10.560 --> 08:11.640
And what does went to?

08:15.450 --> 08:25.830
If the one queen, 73 is chummy, if King F2, then Queen EF1 is actually checkmate the night controls

08:26.370 --> 08:26.960
Jeoffrey.

08:27.360 --> 08:29.190
So it's a positionally crushing game.

08:29.940 --> 08:36.090
It is one of the nightmare game examples, which is featured actually in my in my London system, because

08:36.090 --> 08:41.700
it's how not to play the London system of light, because you're you're getting a kind of stone wall

08:41.700 --> 08:45.460
where one of your bishops is kind of imprisoned.

08:46.110 --> 08:52.920
So, yeah, the concept of harmony for me is demonstrated in this game, peace, harmony quite vividly.

08:55.050 --> 08:57.300
But there are also several other games.

08:58.350 --> 09:05.730
Michael Adams, which are worthy of study, although we have a section on learning from the world champions,

09:05.730 --> 09:11.070
but you can also learn from your local country champions, their country, they are champions for a

09:11.070 --> 09:13.220
reason, I am pretty sure.

09:13.230 --> 09:18.310
You know, Michael Adams is renowned for his positional strategic understanding.

09:18.630 --> 09:26.760
In fact, I you know, I think a lot of the time he's using you know, he seems to be like a human version

09:26.760 --> 09:33.090
of the Lillah, you know, network in terms of human embrace, peace, harmony, positional play generally.

09:35.460 --> 09:39.450
And he's been a superb grandmaster for so many years.

09:39.630 --> 09:43.590
You know, you know, record number of years, over twenty, 700 consistently.

09:44.130 --> 09:50.130
To get that level of consistency, you need to be a very, very good player fundamentally.

09:50.700 --> 09:55.950
And if you look at his games, you will see lots of examples, positional examples where he's really

09:55.950 --> 10:00.170
minimized the counterplay of opponents dramatically.

10:00.780 --> 10:02.900
So, OK, this is a great example for me.

10:02.910 --> 10:09.600
I hope you enjoyed this example and get an idea that you shouldn't in this particular example, at least

10:10.140 --> 10:16.200
you should think carefully about how many of pieces and pawns, especially not having terrible bishops,

10:16.800 --> 10:19.770
because it just it just damages your counterplay.

10:20.400 --> 10:27.120
It means the opponent kind of gets a free hand to start attacking squares, which are very awkward to

10:27.120 --> 10:28.470
defend in your position.

10:28.470 --> 10:31.410
And you can't really do anything to counterattack.

10:31.500 --> 10:33.660
You've just destroyed your own counterplay.

10:33.960 --> 10:40.830
So harmony is a key ingredient to keep going to some extent in your position because otherwise you will

10:40.830 --> 10:43.680
just end up letting the opponent do whatever they want.

10:44.430 --> 10:45.990
OK, that's too much.
