WEBVTT

00:01.280 --> 00:07.730
Hi there in this life, shall we say, in my view, a really interesting, instructive game is played

00:07.730 --> 00:10.250
in the British ship of 1999.

00:10.700 --> 00:17.840
Jim Clancy, very dangerous, dynamic tactical player in general against Michael Adams.

00:18.180 --> 00:20.150
So let's see what happened in this game.

00:20.630 --> 00:22.840
For me, it illustrates you've got to be important.

00:22.970 --> 00:27.590
You've got to be very, very careful of your pawns, pawns to not go backwards.

00:29.390 --> 00:36.320
And as such, unlike other pieces, they reflect irreversible decisions in other domains like information

00:36.320 --> 00:43.130
technology, the wrong kind of recommendations to leave the so-called irreversible decisions, the loss,

00:43.130 --> 00:50.690
responsible moments, because you don't want to regret something you can't really reverse without incurring

00:50.690 --> 00:51.650
huge costs.

00:51.980 --> 01:00.200
In fact, in software, you know, architects try and factor those early on to try and get that risk

01:00.200 --> 01:04.130
under control, those ones which are most costly to kind of change.

01:04.130 --> 01:08.540
Later, they try and make the right decisions that it's very, very difficult sometimes to make the

01:08.540 --> 01:12.050
right decisions when there's an irreversibility about it.

01:12.320 --> 01:16.360
One of the big innovations in computers is the undo button.

01:16.730 --> 01:21.650
Where would we be quite often in software without an undo button on the chessboard?

01:21.650 --> 01:25.960
When we move a pawn forward, there's no undo button like the other pieces.

01:26.570 --> 01:27.890
So just bear that in mind.

01:27.890 --> 01:34.660
It's like one of the big lessons that, you know, many, many positional grandmasters like David Noad

01:34.670 --> 01:35.560
is well aware of.

01:35.870 --> 01:41.570
He once went and did a lecture and they're expecting some opening, very dazzling combinations.

01:41.900 --> 01:44.570
And he just emphasized, you know, --'s do not go backwards.

01:45.570 --> 01:49.640
Just bear that in mind in your games, because here, let's have a look at this game now.

01:49.640 --> 01:50.810
Plaskett against animes.

01:50.810 --> 02:02.240
Knight a free of we see these 46 jeoffrey from Plaskett B6 from ASMs determinately some White Castles

02:02.540 --> 02:06.680
C5 C4 Seatmates Queen 64.

02:06.980 --> 02:12.740
So far so good good besame seven Seefried d6.

02:12.770 --> 02:18.320
So Adams is using the kind of hedgehog pwn structure a prickly hedgehog structure.

02:19.250 --> 02:26.870
Roody one a6 we see a fall so it's a kind of boyens structure.

02:26.870 --> 02:32.890
Moxey bind here from white knight beedi seven queeny free queen c7.

02:33.410 --> 02:40.790
Be Frank Adams Castles special be two AC eight right before here.

02:40.790 --> 02:46.790
It seems as though you know Plaskett wants to do something aggressive and dynamic after rook.

02:47.180 --> 02:48.500
He ain't AC1.

02:48.500 --> 02:56.840
It seems his pieces are well placed and would suggest, you know, maybe to start considering some sort

02:56.840 --> 02:58.190
of battering ram against blacks.

02:58.190 --> 03:01.940
Kingside wants to try and win this in a brilliant way.

03:02.180 --> 03:06.110
So Atrius played we see Queen Bee eight.

03:06.110 --> 03:11.090
So Adams just sitting back in this hedgehog's structure, sitting back, waiting a little bit.

03:11.750 --> 03:12.740
We see Rocky one.

03:12.740 --> 03:18.740
And in fact, with this very rookie one has played, Desex is not that vulnerable.

03:18.740 --> 03:20.840
It seems not that exploitable right now at all.

03:21.200 --> 03:27.080
Seems, though, why it's a long way away from exploiting that pawn, which seems to be a potential

03:27.080 --> 03:28.130
theoretical target.

03:28.130 --> 03:32.390
But nothing's like even on defoliate we see.

03:32.990 --> 03:35.600
In fact, now rook see the one?

03:35.600 --> 03:36.620
OK, Bishop Eighty.

03:37.550 --> 03:44.060
But Plaskett is not interested in probing this pawn he's actually interested in affords him some sort

03:44.060 --> 03:50.090
of kingside attack is planned here now.

03:50.300 --> 03:55.040
Otherwise if I were actually giving himself for one moment a backward pawn.

03:56.840 --> 03:58.880
So it's up to pieces to defend these things.

03:59.900 --> 04:00.840
We see offtakes.

04:00.860 --> 04:05.270
If I buy a perk of the back of pawn, it does support the five points further.

04:05.310 --> 04:10.130
Once Pawlenty force now being kind of isolated, there's no follow pawns.

04:11.180 --> 04:15.320
So what's not without structural issues here either?

04:16.070 --> 04:16.880
Look at one.

04:19.070 --> 04:23.210
So does the activity compensate for plainness for her?

04:23.720 --> 04:26.840
On the other hand, you know why it has also weakened some key Diggles.

04:26.840 --> 04:32.210
If the king staying there, this diagonal could potentially be a downside of one's position.

04:32.210 --> 04:39.170
Later, we see Bishop C6 saying basically in terms of peace, harmony, that if this note is given up,

04:39.170 --> 04:43.430
this bishop isn't particularly harmonious, stuck behind its own pawn.

04:43.790 --> 04:47.540
So maybe, you know, blacks bishop isn't really doing much.

04:48.140 --> 04:50.960
And here it kind of threatens B5.

04:51.830 --> 04:57.170
Now, Nîmes, which has an expression, acronyms, which the frat is often stronger than the execution

04:57.830 --> 05:02.870
if you can actually provoke the opponent to play irreversible decisions.

05:04.190 --> 05:08.190
Like -- moves, the opponent may regret those decisions later.

05:09.170 --> 05:16.850
There's weak points which are being created and in fact, with those weak points, as pieces get exchanged

05:16.850 --> 05:20.650
off, those weak points tend to be amplified more and more.

05:21.740 --> 05:26.540
It's like with space, the space opposition.

05:26.540 --> 05:30.050
If you have more space, there's a responsibility to look after the space.

05:32.030 --> 05:33.380
And to become a weakness.

05:35.500 --> 05:40.080
It's like if you had a big, spacious garden, you need to maintain it regularly, otherwise, you know,

05:40.090 --> 05:41.500
it becomes a sort of liability.

05:41.500 --> 05:47.080
The same on the chessboard where space becomes comes responsibility.

05:47.500 --> 05:53.910
There's a comfortable kind of ratio between the number of pieces you have in the amount of space justified.

05:54.700 --> 06:04.060
We see a four so tempting, an irreversible decision and we see that B, free is fundamentally a kind

06:04.060 --> 06:06.570
of backward pawn in one's position.

06:06.580 --> 06:13.690
Now it can only be supported by pieces, so both sides have to circle back the pawns.

06:14.060 --> 06:14.620
In fact,

06:17.830 --> 06:22.030
we see now the bishop dropping back.

06:22.360 --> 06:28.060
So that is not an offer anymore to take out that bishop would have to.

06:28.080 --> 06:33.910
In fact, 1957, although white, it does seem tempting to use this phone.

06:34.720 --> 06:39.310
How effective is this with a big boy sitting on a phone protecting f7 this stumbling drugs?

06:39.370 --> 06:41.410
How effective is that in this situation?

06:42.040 --> 06:50.560
In the meantime, there's a plot for bee free her to be proud royalty AF1 and we see 95.

06:51.250 --> 06:57.910
In fact, there's a specific tactical nuance here of the rook, the one which shows, you know, if

06:57.910 --> 07:04.150
you're not a brilliant tactician as well as a brilliant positional player, then you might not be able

07:04.150 --> 07:09.400
to do anything with the opportunities as they arise.

07:09.610 --> 07:15.430
Now, here there is a golden opportunity to kind of dismantle the entire white position.

07:16.000 --> 07:22.990
I wonder if you can spot it if I give you five cents for the video and it shows actually these kind

07:22.990 --> 07:23.800
of decisions.

07:23.800 --> 07:30.100
You know, the CIFOR and the A4 have given them back support, which is only supported by piece.

07:30.700 --> 07:35.040
So that piece dependancy is a characteristic of a weakness.

07:35.050 --> 07:41.320
If you have candidate weaknesses in the opponents pawn structure, you want to look for where you know

07:41.500 --> 07:43.210
there's greater dependencies.

07:43.420 --> 07:49.980
Sometimes you can knock out those dependencies and really expose underlying those underlying weaknesses.

07:50.440 --> 07:57.600
So here there's a tactical move which really causes why it collapsed in a spectacular manner.

07:59.620 --> 08:02.130
So if I give you five seconds, what would you play in this position?

08:07.150 --> 08:09.160
OK, it's nice to be free.

08:10.810 --> 08:18.550
It's only protected by a piece, but now with that undermine, you know, see for an eye for a weekend.

08:19.210 --> 08:25.870
And the problem with this now of the night after, for it leads to another undermine and undermine leading

08:25.870 --> 08:30.730
to one another on the point that, in fact, hold on a sec.

08:30.730 --> 08:34.120
FBI, too, has taken out its unwitting Sifry.

08:34.480 --> 08:41.750
And wait a second, isn't Sifry a kind of killer common square of the bishop and the rook here?

08:43.210 --> 08:44.050
This is what I mean.

08:44.050 --> 08:52.720
This is like a total collapse of White's position based on one or two extra -- moves, which maybe

08:52.720 --> 08:53.920
shouldn't being played.

08:54.460 --> 08:59.530
All of a sudden, White's position is collapsing, you might think.

08:59.560 --> 08:59.920
Hold on.

08:59.920 --> 09:00.370
Hold on.

09:01.110 --> 09:03.530
Wasn't the FBI holding up F7?

09:03.550 --> 09:04.480
Isn't that an issue?

09:05.500 --> 09:06.670
That's the issue that.

09:09.150 --> 09:14.940
This next wave kind of looked at, but lightning speed, so it's fundamentally, you know, it's going

09:14.940 --> 09:16.300
to win the every night next.

09:16.830 --> 09:19.770
So losing F7 here is not a checkmate or anything.

09:19.770 --> 09:21.210
It's just the queen unsupported.

09:21.780 --> 09:23.150
Now, Siegfried's vulnerable.

09:25.170 --> 09:32.100
So if we take stock here now of the rotates Brooks C7, this played evicting the queen first, not even

09:32.110 --> 09:36.960
rogue taxi for a rogue taxi was actually fine as well.

09:36.960 --> 09:44.280
If we look at this position, three, four, five, one, two, three, four, pawn up lovely bishops,

09:44.280 --> 09:45.350
especially the Dallas Cowboys.

09:47.040 --> 09:50.250
This is just a very, very pleasant possession with Jeoffrey on the fire.

09:53.230 --> 09:53.750
You know what?

09:53.890 --> 09:59.410
What would we be doing here and if there is on the.

10:02.050 --> 10:06.130
So anyway, but this is nifty kicking the queen out first.

10:08.530 --> 10:19.270
We see Queen after an ROTC free her, so it seems how long is it is this really so significant, this

10:19.270 --> 10:19.780
position?

10:22.930 --> 10:26.030
Well, the prettiness of one's position has gone away.

10:26.410 --> 10:28.090
Black is technically a PornHub.

10:28.450 --> 10:30.140
Black does have that Beshir power.

10:30.280 --> 10:33.360
They seem to be so classically placed.

10:33.360 --> 10:38.390
This symbol or rather modernly place these these bishops crisscrossing like this.

10:39.040 --> 10:45.550
But is there a specific issue here causing White to be in big trouble?

10:48.090 --> 10:56.850
Yes, there is that why is under severe pressure in this situation, I think also there's liberation

10:56.850 --> 10:59.430
or opportunities here behind the scenes.

10:59.790 --> 11:02.910
Why plays the tuba as an example?

11:07.210 --> 11:08.110
You know, say.

11:10.260 --> 11:14.780
King to the dance choir, bishop without our counterpoint is a bit of a menace.

11:14.800 --> 11:16.980
You know, what about moves like Bishop E5?

11:17.340 --> 11:23.770
How does then how does Y address Jeoffrey as an issue?

11:23.790 --> 11:25.370
It's very, very tricky.

11:26.070 --> 11:28.650
Yeah, that is one of the big assets here.

11:28.650 --> 11:31.370
In fact, it's not just the act of just having a bishop.

11:31.500 --> 11:37.830
Sometimes it is literally a more specific role that a bishop without a counterpart giving you superiority

11:37.830 --> 11:43.800
on that whole set of colors and dark squares around the board like Jeoffrey are particularly vulnerable

11:43.800 --> 11:46.320
now of this kind of move.

11:46.320 --> 11:51.510
You know, it's very difficult to fans, let alone, you know, opportunities like the five, which

11:51.510 --> 11:53.400
would further battery on Jeoffrey.

11:53.740 --> 11:55.160
Very, very painful stuff.

11:56.340 --> 12:04.560
So we see this move 92 and why it really collapses just in a few moves from here of the work have eight.

12:06.520 --> 12:11.590
Because night before is kind of taken control of the four, in fact, and now Bishop DeFore check.

12:13.850 --> 12:21.710
And all of a sudden, the hold on Bishop DeFore has now got access to a new square.

12:21.740 --> 12:25.310
It's like Chess's a lot about winning access to squares.

12:25.820 --> 12:30.400
Why it's been really hacked in terms of giving up squares.

12:30.410 --> 12:35.720
Why shouldn't have given up squares like, you know, in the field of information security?

12:35.720 --> 12:37.910
That one's given up key squares like every.

12:37.910 --> 12:39.490
Now, where is this queen going?

12:40.040 --> 12:42.830
The queen hasn't got that many squares.

12:43.340 --> 12:47.180
It's really spectacularly gone bad, this position.

12:47.690 --> 12:53.150
The Queen's only got like Jiwon and now the game ends on this next move.

12:54.500 --> 12:58.130
Can you see if I give you five cents for every black player?

12:58.550 --> 13:00.350
Because hang on, you know what?

13:01.220 --> 13:03.260
Isn't the rook hanging as well?

13:05.030 --> 13:06.170
When did this happen?

13:06.170 --> 13:07.820
When when was the rook hanging?

13:08.630 --> 13:13.550
It seems, you know, even I've played through this game several times, but things seem to happen so

13:13.550 --> 13:18.500
quickly in this game after that initial, you know, undermine then draw the line.

13:19.250 --> 13:23.650
The square bishop is just like a monster piece all round the board and all of that.

13:23.660 --> 13:24.890
Why is this rook hanging?

13:25.460 --> 13:28.570
The thing is, you know, if Bishop takes fine, OK, there's queen free.

13:28.640 --> 13:29.660
But when did this happen?

13:29.690 --> 13:30.550
Let's rewind.

13:30.830 --> 13:33.770
When when on earth did this happen?

13:37.460 --> 13:41.240
The rook was x raying, was being x rayed by the bishop here.

13:42.860 --> 13:49.670
So so happens around here that actually this is a double tag unleashing that attack on the rogue and

13:49.670 --> 13:50.180
the queen.

13:50.540 --> 13:51.650
It was a double attack.

13:52.790 --> 13:54.260
And this is a desperate defense.

13:54.260 --> 13:56.900
But now Adams just plays Rook Differe shutting down.

13:58.820 --> 14:00.320
You know, Queen takes a look at the end.

14:00.320 --> 14:02.480
So we're just leaving this double attack.

14:05.340 --> 14:06.240
Devastating.

14:09.050 --> 14:14.000
This is why for me, you know, if you want to study -- structures in human chess, you look at atoms

14:14.000 --> 14:21.680
and, you know, certain grandmasters, you know, like Eric Hanson have also expressed, you know,

14:21.680 --> 14:24.410
that they've studied Michael Adams.

14:24.800 --> 14:26.720
He's a fantastic structuralist.

14:27.800 --> 14:30.830
We can study the world champions in the unofficial world champions.

14:30.830 --> 14:37.730
But if we want to learn about Paul structure, you go to a specialist, maybe a specialist in the U.K.

14:37.730 --> 14:42.860
Is Michael Adams a specialist as a structuralist in the US is yassa.

14:42.870 --> 14:46.640
So when they just love Puhn structures.

14:48.110 --> 14:55.280
They literally called structuralists Bahir, you know, it's like such a rapid tactical disaster, it's

14:55.280 --> 14:58.640
difficult to take this all in in one go.

14:58.790 --> 15:02.980
What on earth has been happening here after night takes be free.

15:02.990 --> 15:06.170
We really need to, like, take this in slow motion.

15:06.170 --> 15:16.610
Some irreversible decisions lead to, you know, a set of undermines which take how essentially a dance

15:16.620 --> 15:22.400
choir bishop, which in itself so there's one undermine after another on the way, which leads to a

15:22.400 --> 15:29.110
kind of further undermine of of why on the dark squares, it's complete obliteration.

15:29.810 --> 15:34.070
It's like free controlled explosions, one after the other.

15:34.070 --> 15:36.320
So quickly this happens.

15:36.650 --> 15:39.320
You don't know what on earth hit white.

15:40.970 --> 15:47.510
So taking out CIFOR, taking out B to all of a sudden all the squares around the board and the rock

15:47.510 --> 15:50.210
is a liability in this in this position.

15:50.510 --> 15:57.860
It's not just, Jeoffrey, it's very difficult to estimate the damage potential of this position in

15:57.860 --> 15:59.630
terms of the stance Squarepusher.

16:00.020 --> 16:06.140
And certainly I've looked at this game several times and there's always a new insight.

16:06.170 --> 16:07.880
This is the funny thing about chess.

16:08.210 --> 16:14.570
As you improve, you can revisit old games and find new finesses that you didn't it didn't really occur

16:14.570 --> 16:14.990
to you.

16:15.500 --> 16:18.470
But, you know, these games are played on the one day time control.

16:18.470 --> 16:19.100
So why not?

16:19.100 --> 16:25.460
They had you know, they spent hours on their moves that we just spectators, tourists, casual tourists.

16:25.460 --> 16:27.170
So maybe that's to be expected.

16:27.470 --> 16:31.040
You revisit these games, you get these new you insights.

16:31.040 --> 16:35.480
But here, it's like essentially free undermines wins in a row have been played.

16:35.960 --> 16:40.250
And why is fatally weak on the dark squares here, even after rooked seefried?

16:40.250 --> 16:43.280
Because the dark square bishop has been taken out.

16:44.480 --> 16:49.280
So yeah, Wykes position has totally been uprooted and exposed on the dark squares in particular.

16:49.280 --> 16:51.650
This bishop isn't so lethal as this one.

16:51.650 --> 16:55.430
I would say that this is the more lethal bishop in the short term here.

16:57.620 --> 17:07.400
But it's so lethal, you know, the this I mean, it looks like a very problematic position here, just

17:07.400 --> 17:11.840
with things like Bishop E5 on the cards, let alone other things.

17:12.500 --> 17:18.440
But, yeah, this exposure of, you know, the unprotected piece on B to the dark sky, it's all coming

17:18.440 --> 17:25.640
together here with the forcing moves, underlining all of these dance great liabilities now, especially

17:25.640 --> 17:31.610
the rock on BE2, just hanging on to a truly crushing game and mysterious to this day.

17:31.610 --> 17:36.650
I have to say, you can look at this game over and over again and pick up more and more finesses.

17:37.100 --> 17:41.300
But this kind of game does echo this idea, the small central idea.

17:41.750 --> 17:44.010
You've got to be careful of your pawn moves.

17:44.030 --> 17:47.090
They are the irreversible decisions on the chessboard.

17:47.390 --> 17:54.470
And that's why, as an annotator certain annotators, I like you know, when I'm looking at games,

17:55.190 --> 17:58.810
when a pawn movies might say, well, why was Paul needed?

17:58.820 --> 18:00.470
Was it really, really justified?

18:00.890 --> 18:04.880
Because they are the irreversible decisions on chess board.

18:05.600 --> 18:08.610
And so when you're playing a game, you should be careful with your moves.

18:08.780 --> 18:09.320
OK.

18:10.460 --> 18:11.060
There's so much.
