WEBVTT

00:00.900 --> 00:01.470
Hi there.

00:02.100 --> 00:09.240
In this case, I just want to talk about generally how if you want to improve as a chess player, there's

00:09.240 --> 00:12.990
an argument for getting experience of different pawn structures.

00:15.550 --> 00:21.480
I'd say that's divided into specific pawn configurations, which can arise from specific openings.

00:21.870 --> 00:28.920
But for sure, the specific structural elements I've tried to outline in this section, you know, like

00:28.920 --> 00:34.770
the double pawns, the pros and cons of double pawns, backward pawns, isolated pawns, hanging pawns,

00:34.980 --> 00:44.850
the structural elements and certain key methods like, you know, undermining or pawn breaks, certain

00:44.850 --> 00:46.770
key methods or the minority attack.

00:47.370 --> 00:52.140
It's like these key methods that are given special names like mine to take these key methods are important

00:52.140 --> 01:00.840
to know because the elements in particular will constitute so many different types of pawn configurations,

01:00.840 --> 01:02.970
pawn structures, skeleton's formations.

01:03.300 --> 01:11.070
Those are occasions when you hear pawn, scouten formation structure, all those acase, those particular

01:11.070 --> 01:11.820
configurations.

01:11.820 --> 01:14.850
If you know the elements, you've got a better idea of what's going on.

01:16.860 --> 01:21.960
So, yeah, it's very, very important, at least in this introduction section, to know about the elements

01:23.130 --> 01:25.650
and you can either do that, you can train on grandmaster games.

01:25.650 --> 01:26.220
You want to do that.

01:26.250 --> 01:32.610
It's good to have actual practical experience with the different elements of pawn structure as well

01:32.610 --> 01:35.880
as perhaps specific pawn configurations.

01:36.840 --> 01:41.930
Now, my arguments are sometimes a little bit unique.

01:41.940 --> 01:49.590
If you play, for example, the London system, which I do recommend as a system, I recommend as a

01:49.590 --> 01:56.970
system because it means you don't have to spend a lot of your time memorizing tons and tons of opening

01:56.970 --> 02:02.330
theory, which seems to be a modern trends, because it seems like a conscientious thing to do.

02:03.750 --> 02:08.520
But, you know, old school thinking is you actually try and understand things.

02:08.520 --> 02:10.320
You don't just memorize facts like in history.

02:10.320 --> 02:12.870
You don't just understand all the dates.

02:12.870 --> 02:15.180
You understand the motivations, the empathy.

02:17.890 --> 02:24.020
For what has happened in history, to avoid repeating the same mistakes in the future, a dynamic approach

02:24.020 --> 02:26.860
to understanding is not necessarily just memorizing stuff.

02:27.340 --> 02:35.950
And when we talk about using a system, you know, some strong players might think, oh, you shouldn't

02:35.950 --> 02:40.620
be playing one system because it would, you know, stop with one as a chess player.

02:40.810 --> 02:46.350
But my argument would play any systems is that it gives you more time to do literally on your own,

02:46.360 --> 02:47.450
your training schedule.

02:47.470 --> 02:50.320
You can spend more time on other weak links in your game.

02:50.320 --> 02:52.630
You can spend more time on tactical training.

02:53.020 --> 02:57.700
Tactics is a really major priority without a tactical understanding.

02:57.700 --> 03:01.900
It's actually no good knowing the more sophisticated stuff because you fall flat on your face tactically

03:02.080 --> 03:07.930
trying to implement anything, especially when you're playing against dynamic pull structures.

03:07.930 --> 03:13.990
You need to be acutely aware of the threats the opponent is making at any stage of your implementation

03:13.990 --> 03:17.860
of slightly improving the pool structure because they can blow you apart tactically.

03:18.670 --> 03:24.370
So if you play a specific system of a specific pool structure all the time and just try and, you know,

03:24.400 --> 03:30.600
play this kind of run the system with the triangle, which, by the way, I don't totally recommend

03:30.610 --> 03:35.920
in my long term course, I show how the system is totally dynamic, depending on what the opponent does.

03:37.300 --> 03:44.410
So even within the system, you know, a true martial system is not setting up a particular form information

03:44.620 --> 03:45.400
all the time.

03:47.320 --> 03:53.080
But even if you do this, yeah, the person is actually literally the time you can spend on other aspects

03:53.080 --> 03:53.560
of chess.

03:53.560 --> 03:57.580
You know, there's also endgames Capablanca was a big fan of learning the endgames.

03:57.580 --> 04:01.810
First thing for beginners to start with the Angang first, then a bit of a mental game, then a bit

04:01.810 --> 04:07.690
of the opening set, a little bit of a foundation, then revisit the in-game level, you know, level

04:07.690 --> 04:09.850
up, then revisit the mental game there.

04:09.890 --> 04:13.560
Well, that's what I'm trying to do in this course, essentially the level numbers.

04:14.470 --> 04:17.530
So why do we need to know in principle?

04:20.270 --> 04:24.800
A diversity of different structures, I would say the elements of the most essential before you look

04:24.800 --> 04:30.620
at specific -- charges, there are pros and cons of each of the elements, and it's great to be acutely

04:30.620 --> 04:34.670
aware of these trade offs that occur quite often.

04:35.540 --> 04:40.190
A seemingly dodgy -- structure gives huge dynamic potential.

04:41.000 --> 04:45.560
So if you're going to play with dynamic structures, you need speak from that point of view, a very

04:45.560 --> 04:50.690
strong tactician sometimes, especially if you're mekaal tell you can play with backward pawns, but

04:50.690 --> 04:51.620
only for example.

04:53.880 --> 05:01.050
You know, Mikoto was playing the piano, they reached its heyday in 1960, and he was having huge success

05:01.050 --> 05:06.300
with the moning, even though structurally it's a bit suspect the boloney, you know, it's got this

05:06.600 --> 05:08.070
desex backward --.

05:08.790 --> 05:10.740
And yet he won loads of games.

05:10.740 --> 05:16.530
There are there are moments, tactical moments, if you're an extremely skilled tactician where you

05:16.530 --> 05:21.660
can see all the positives with dynamic structure and you get fantastic combinations and tanks.

05:22.200 --> 05:28.350
But if you're not Mikoto and you play with these slightly dicey, dodgy pawn structures controversial,

05:28.350 --> 05:31.970
then you could just be punished without a fight.

05:32.670 --> 05:35.800
Your your, you know, might not see any benefits.

05:36.090 --> 05:40.440
So it's important to build your tactical foundations even before any talk of power structures.

05:40.650 --> 05:45.300
I mean, that's one of my key points here, that if you're going to play the dynamic paunches, you

05:45.300 --> 05:47.340
better be good, you know, tactically.

05:49.110 --> 05:54.180
And we can actually use our openings to direct where we don't even have pawns, when we use gambits,

05:54.180 --> 05:59.550
when we clearly when we clear the sense of when there's more peace activity, it makes the games more

05:59.550 --> 06:00.200
tactical.

06:00.450 --> 06:05.820
So even playing things like the Kings game, which one sounds, if it gives you a flair for the romantic

06:05.820 --> 06:12.600
era of chess, for sacrifices for hand-to-hand combat on the chessboard, that's good training, very,

06:12.600 --> 06:16.770
very good training for when you play the dynamic pawn structures.

06:19.000 --> 06:24.430
So, yes, there's a tangible foundation and there's an elemental foundation of structures that you

06:24.430 --> 06:30.070
should at least know the power structure elements, the pros and cons, in my view, like the back report,

06:30.070 --> 06:32.050
I say, but you need to know the pros and cons of those.

06:32.050 --> 06:34.120
And that's what this section does.

06:36.020 --> 06:39.750
And you don't literally always have to play these things yourself, you're going to look at the world

06:39.750 --> 06:43.350
champions, the champions, generally, the champions in your country, if you prefer.

06:43.830 --> 06:48.120
You may have had more personal contact with your country's champion of your states.

06:48.120 --> 06:54.940
You might have seen several or all the other United States grandmasters in later generations.

06:54.950 --> 06:59.280
So you might there's a balance between, you know, the champions and the ones you've also maybe have

06:59.280 --> 07:01.700
a personal connection or more personal interest.

07:02.010 --> 07:02.490
Fine.

07:02.790 --> 07:06.390
But you can get experience of different pool structures just by looking at most the games.

07:06.400 --> 07:08.700
You don't always have to play these different paunches yourself.

07:09.120 --> 07:14.820
And it's, you know, job, of course, is like this to draw your attention to key games with the examples.

07:15.210 --> 07:20.520
So, yeah, and understanding of different pools is essential, but you don't need to necessarily throw

07:20.520 --> 07:21.570
away your lunch system.

07:21.570 --> 07:28.620
And if you follow an amazing course, my my answers and you'll get a variety of points in any case,

07:28.620 --> 07:33.650
even with the London system, and you can still get lots of time for training other departments.

07:33.660 --> 07:38.640
It's like having multiple departments, your opening department, Millgate and going to Poland.

07:38.970 --> 07:42.420
And there's also other skills which relate like psychology.

07:42.420 --> 07:46.980
You've got to be able to take losses, got to have a thick skin to do post-mortem on your losses.

07:46.980 --> 07:53.250
Find out where you went wrong, come to come back better to truly put yourself beyond the fee in chess

07:53.610 --> 07:58.770
is to have a thick skin because then it doesn't matter if you are actually technically defeated.

07:59.340 --> 08:02.790
You as a chess playing entity will come back stronger the next time.

08:02.790 --> 08:05.460
Stronger, stronger, stronger and even on your wins.

08:05.460 --> 08:10.830
As Kasparov has highlighted, you find out improvements even in your wins because it's a battle out

08:10.830 --> 08:11.190
there.

08:11.850 --> 08:15.750
People to look at your wins and see, you know, is there a downside anyway?

08:15.750 --> 08:17.730
You've got to iron out your weaknesses like Beth.

08:18.030 --> 08:20.340
And in that face, she went over a wins.

08:21.420 --> 08:25.560
That's the Kasparov, you know, behind the writing of the Queen's Gambit.

08:25.560 --> 08:28.470
Netflix is something he emphasized, even your wins.

08:28.470 --> 08:30.870
You want to find out and come back stronger next time.

08:31.290 --> 08:36.990
But anyway, do you need to try out all these weird one for opening's just to get the constructors?

08:37.170 --> 08:38.160
Not necessarily.

08:38.700 --> 08:44.430
I think a tactical foundation comes before the more refined, you know, structural concerns.

08:45.720 --> 08:50.700
So essentially, if you're especially playing a dynamic pawn structure, so you're playing with backward

08:50.700 --> 08:57.690
pawns, backward, say, pawns, you know, hanging horns, whatever, you can leverage the dynamic

08:57.690 --> 09:00.960
opportunities, which might only be small windows of opportunity.

09:01.170 --> 09:03.480
And it's like in the only very small windows.

09:04.230 --> 09:09.150
And on the other side of the coin, if you're structuralist, you want to try and reduce the opponent's

09:09.150 --> 09:14.270
counterplay, but you still got to be totally aware at all times of what the opponent is tactically

09:14.280 --> 09:14.880
fraternising.

09:15.270 --> 09:20.190
So the tactical foundation is essential for you to be aware of the opponent's tactical threats and combinations

09:20.460 --> 09:22.710
and just not let them exist on the board.

09:23.190 --> 09:24.780
Or if they do, they're punishable.

09:25.260 --> 09:29.940
So tactics is the foundation prior, in my view, to structural concerns.

09:32.410 --> 09:38.680
But I hope this, you know, theoretical discussion as of views, so don't be too ashamed if you stick

09:38.680 --> 09:40.810
to the same structure, you got a lot of the comments.

09:40.810 --> 09:44.230
The master and psychology is a big part of human chess.

09:46.810 --> 09:50.950
We must put ourselves beyond the feet in terms of the technical defeat.

09:54.270 --> 10:00.650
So even if you lose, you come back stronger, stronger, stronger, stronger next time, OK, insulin's.
