WEBVTT

00:00.990 --> 00:01.660
Hi there.

00:02.790 --> 00:11.710
In this lecture, there is an amazing tactical idea, which is of the theme, removing the guard, the

00:11.730 --> 00:14.420
FEMSA and undermining Israel and undermining style move.

00:14.730 --> 00:20.160
And bear in mind, when you undermine actually you don't always need to just win material.

00:20.160 --> 00:22.250
You can actually win access to a square.

00:22.950 --> 00:24.960
It's very, very handy sometimes in winning.

00:25.560 --> 00:31.350
So, you know, if you have a winning combination, you don't really be too fussy if it kind of reminds

00:31.350 --> 00:36.060
you of undermining, but it's undermining a square and sort of actually a piece of a poem.

00:36.540 --> 00:37.230
And you still win.

00:37.230 --> 00:39.110
It doesn't actually matter.

00:39.240 --> 00:39.870
You still win.

00:39.870 --> 00:40.210
Right.

00:40.980 --> 00:44.300
So here can you see a key undermining stall tactic?

00:44.310 --> 00:46.170
If I give you five seconds for the video?

00:50.040 --> 00:55.860
OK, yeah, we can remove this defender of if it's actually OK, it's not defending a piece of a --,

00:56.310 --> 00:58.700
but it's defending a case where they have to pawn.

00:59.160 --> 01:00.810
So it's worth making a note of that.

01:00.960 --> 01:02.460
We're removing that defender.

01:04.050 --> 01:09.930
So White played Rook takes AFTA and now with that newly won square, we can actually make use of it.

01:10.590 --> 01:12.420
93 Chac, unfortunately.

01:12.420 --> 01:13.500
And the bishops are not covering it.

01:13.500 --> 01:14.400
Nothing's covering it.

01:14.850 --> 01:16.350
And we've got a Royal Forker.

01:16.560 --> 01:17.910
We're talking king and queen.

01:19.170 --> 01:25.290
So I'm talking to you on 1962 and up to 94 queening six White resigned.

01:25.950 --> 01:31.100
So that was in Bronagh against Joseph Rickter in 1941, by the way.

01:31.920 --> 01:32.550
So, yes.

01:33.510 --> 01:39.000
So sometimes we can undermine just again a key square as this example shows.

01:39.270 --> 01:40.500
I wouldn't be too fussy.

01:40.500 --> 01:44.820
It's the same kind of principle you're removing a key defender, which is part of a chain.

01:44.880 --> 01:46.440
That chain could be a logical chain.

01:46.660 --> 01:52.320
It could be, you know, it's statements could be a pawn, a pawn or pawn or piece of a pawn in the

01:52.320 --> 01:52.800
square.

01:53.310 --> 02:00.030
It's you're just undermining logically a part of board here if it is logically undermined by taking

02:00.030 --> 02:01.150
out the effort to pawn.

02:01.850 --> 02:02.220
Okay.

02:02.220 --> 02:04.710
So I hope that's a useful thing to think about.

02:05.610 --> 02:07.440
And you've got that answer much.