WEBVTT

00:01.050 --> 00:02.010
Hi there.

00:02.040 --> 00:07.860
In this lecture, we see one of my favorite international monsters, my s-pen, his super strong.

00:07.860 --> 00:13.680
And he's a great attacking player and he's a specialist in the Smith Munroe game against the Sicilian

00:13.680 --> 00:14.310
defense.

00:14.310 --> 00:17.700
This is his iconic game against the fang, really.

00:17.700 --> 00:21.090
In 2011, the 112th U.S. Open.

00:21.090 --> 00:29.460
So E4 from Aspen, Van Weenie plays the Sicilian defense and Aspen uses his Smith Morris gambit, which

00:29.460 --> 00:31.260
he has very detailed preparation in.

00:31.560 --> 00:39.390
So this is also an example of aggressive kind of attacking opening systems.

00:39.390 --> 00:44.880
It's good if you have done your research, your legwork, your preparation, your groundwork in these

00:44.880 --> 00:48.420
systems to help guarantee attacking potential.

00:48.990 --> 00:53.610
So look for and really accepts the gambit.

00:53.610 --> 01:03.210
We have 19 C3 nine C6 lines, F3, E6 and non Bishop C4 a6 White Castles ninth g seven.

01:03.630 --> 01:11.070
So it seems in particular Grandmaster seem to adopt this set up against Essman and he plays actually

01:11.070 --> 01:11.790
Bishop G5.

01:11.790 --> 01:19.560
He doesn't mind provoking small weaknesses with Bishop G5 so f6 Bishop E3 you can see that it's slightly

01:19.560 --> 01:21.750
weakened this diagonal.

01:22.290 --> 01:27.810
We have 90 G6 now just to demonstrate there's another potential threat in this position of A4.

01:27.810 --> 01:31.650
Let me just show you a silly move just to demonstrate a four.

01:32.640 --> 01:42.690
So here you can see actually that if B5 Bishop B6 is dangerous, so just just be aware that sometimes

01:42.690 --> 01:45.660
B6 is sensitive, it's just an insight into the position.

01:45.660 --> 01:49.500
So G6 Bishop B3 is played.

01:52.110 --> 01:52.950
And.

01:54.270 --> 01:55.140
Here.

01:57.500 --> 02:04.190
There was actually an interesting options Bishop Beefy, which is 95 straight away which would flatten

02:04.190 --> 02:05.110
Bishop B6.

02:05.120 --> 02:08.780
That's another way of saying this because it's covering E7 here.

02:09.110 --> 02:17.990
So if he takes he takes C5, this is not working here, but it's it's insightful to show why it's not

02:17.990 --> 02:18.470
working.

02:18.470 --> 02:20.750
So 9/10 9/10.

02:20.840 --> 02:25.010
The point is, in this position Black could play D6.

02:25.190 --> 02:31.130
It's actually not working at all because we don't get this attacking piece that attacking ingredients

02:31.160 --> 02:36.650
is totally removed from the equation, so there's far less attack potential.

02:38.480 --> 02:42.320
So yeah, 95, although interesting, it just doesn't work.

02:42.590 --> 02:44.150
So the bishop drops back.

02:45.770 --> 02:50.060
We have B5 being played now.

02:50.240 --> 03:01.790
If I E5 here, E4 is interesting nine times Bishop b6 this position, it should end up with actually

03:01.790 --> 03:02.990
an advantage for white.

03:02.990 --> 03:07.580
So even positionally with that clamping down, it should be okay for white.

03:07.580 --> 03:14.870
For example, like this variation, we have a kind of bind over here which make things, you know,

03:14.930 --> 03:15.560
worth it.

03:15.560 --> 03:19.820
But anyway, so B5 try to do something about the binding stuff perhaps.

03:19.820 --> 03:26.000
But here what is now effective in this position, which wasn't before for 100 points, what would you

03:26.000 --> 03:26.720
play here?

03:28.010 --> 03:30.590
So attacking ingredients guaranteed.

03:31.580 --> 03:33.590
Okay, It's 95.

03:33.710 --> 03:38.770
This is a bit of a slow move with the king in the center in a theoretical sense.

03:38.810 --> 03:44.780
But the key thing is in practice, we need to make sure we've got this attacking Bishop So six now and

03:44.780 --> 03:47.840
we've got that attacking weapon, that attacking ingredients.

03:48.170 --> 03:50.750
So no time for Black to have played D6.

03:50.750 --> 03:57.470
We have Bishop Be7 and now Knight takes e5, F takes e5.

03:58.310 --> 04:04.970
If Knight takes E5 here Rookie one and in this position we can hold D6.

04:05.570 --> 04:12.680
So we've got big threats like F4 if King the eight This is now unpleasant for black with that king in

04:12.680 --> 04:14.420
the center, it's very unpleasant.

04:14.600 --> 04:20.840
There's enough compensation for whites to play like this, for example, with Bishop B6 check.

04:20.840 --> 04:22.010
And it gets vicious.

04:22.010 --> 04:25.190
It gets nasty, massive advantage for white.

04:25.460 --> 04:27.320
So F takes is played.

04:27.320 --> 04:30.470
But now s been tries to open up the king of F4.

04:30.500 --> 04:35.420
We have Queen f6 which is actually a mistake it seems in a technical sense.

04:35.420 --> 04:40.570
It takes F4 which is hugely scary to open up the F4.

04:40.580 --> 04:49.280
But rookie one bear with this f tanks, rook tanks e free jack Bishop e seven This position, it seems

04:49.310 --> 04:54.950
black, might be able to actually live to tell the tale, especially if black is a supercomputer and

04:54.950 --> 05:00.170
able to play all these defensive moves in a row, then sure, that's going to live to tell the tale.

05:00.350 --> 05:05.810
It's a very dynamic treatment indeed, but it ends up to be an even position.

05:05.810 --> 05:12.050
If we get this position, it's simplified and it's going to be even, you know, you could say, well,

05:12.080 --> 05:19.790
maybe there's even still a slight edge for white, though, but okay, so Queen f6 Grandmaster makes

05:19.790 --> 05:21.800
this move, which technically is a mistake.

05:21.800 --> 05:25.040
AF takes E5, but why is it mistake?

05:25.040 --> 05:31.010
Because the Queen seems to be acting as if it's an authority on the position, controlling key squares,

05:32.000 --> 05:33.470
making things awkward.

05:33.620 --> 05:41.270
And also, you know, there's a there's a threat potentially of Bishop takes D6 looking at H two so

05:42.770 --> 05:52.190
Hans ESPN's efforts here comes at absolutely nothing he plays an absolutely beautiful iconic move for

05:52.190 --> 05:56.690
the Smith moral gambit in general, which shows how dangerous gambits are.

05:56.870 --> 06:01.490
Espin has talked about the notion of sacrifice, and that doesn't need to be material.

06:01.880 --> 06:04.100
It could be pawn structure as well.

06:04.100 --> 06:07.070
You sacrifice to try and get checkmate.

06:07.100 --> 06:10.340
Checkmate ends the game so you can sacrifice all sorts of things.

06:10.340 --> 06:15.440
You can probably, you know, sometimes in many situations, sacrifice your own king safety to get to

06:15.440 --> 06:16.700
the opponent's king safety.

06:16.910 --> 06:21.860
So the idea of reducing the opponent's king stake to try and make the opponent's king, everything else

06:21.860 --> 06:24.230
can become subservient through sacrifice.

06:24.230 --> 06:29.300
But here there's actually a really great sacrifice to exploit the king in the center.

06:29.300 --> 06:32.300
So for 200 points, what do you think that move is?

06:35.310 --> 06:36.060
Okay.

06:36.270 --> 06:39.120
It's actually it's Bishop G.

06:39.120 --> 06:39.420
Five.

06:39.420 --> 06:46.860
It takes escape squares of the king and it frets rookie one as well, pinning the queen.

06:46.860 --> 06:51.390
So there's no time for Bishop takes these things because we just pinned the queen.

06:51.960 --> 06:54.300
So we have Bishop E seven of Queen.

06:54.300 --> 06:55.140
Thanks, G five.

06:55.140 --> 07:00.780
There's a really neat point here that actually these pawns have an Achilles heel.

07:00.780 --> 07:02.760
They're not looking at dance squares.

07:02.760 --> 07:04.410
We have Queen E one check.

07:05.190 --> 07:11.430
Bouncy Rhodes of attack comes mind snooker, bouncing off E one to get a five.

07:12.270 --> 07:17.730
And then we can mate with Queen C seven If King E a bishop F seven is checkmate.

07:18.480 --> 07:25.980
So yes, that would be unwise if Bishop takes D six actually even stronger than rookie one.

07:27.810 --> 07:29.850
Actually, Rookie one would be a mistake here.

07:30.390 --> 07:30.810
Yeah.

07:30.810 --> 07:33.420
We got to pay attention to the details.

07:34.950 --> 07:43.380
Stronger than rookie one rookie one's a mistake actually because Bishop e4 so disposition does actually.

07:44.890 --> 07:47.800
You know, Bishop C five check and then queen size E four.

07:47.830 --> 07:53.210
So Bishop E four is nasty there and black still looking at H two.

07:53.230 --> 07:54.400
So forget that.

07:54.640 --> 07:59.180
In fact, there's Bishop of Southern Czech and this works very well.

07:59.200 --> 07:59.930
Bishop H.

07:59.960 --> 08:02.860
G6 Czech Bishop.

08:02.940 --> 08:04.030
Stubborn Czech.

08:04.270 --> 08:04.690
Bishop.

08:04.690 --> 08:05.800
B Free Czech.

08:05.920 --> 08:06.760
Queen H five.

08:06.760 --> 08:07.450
Czech.

08:07.630 --> 08:08.530
Bishop F seven.

08:08.530 --> 08:09.190
Czech.

08:09.550 --> 08:10.420
Queen H six.

08:10.420 --> 08:11.110
Czech.

08:12.160 --> 08:12.730
Bishop D.

08:12.730 --> 08:13.000
Five.

08:13.000 --> 08:13.690
Czech.

08:15.470 --> 08:16.630
Queen since she's seven.

08:16.640 --> 08:17.030
Yeah.

08:17.030 --> 08:21.140
So that works much better on Bishop 26 because you're wondering so.

08:21.290 --> 08:32.570
Okay, we have Bishop E seven being played by Winnie and here Bishop F seven shank now D tanks, E,

08:32.570 --> 08:35.540
seven shank, nine six, and now Queen D two.

08:35.960 --> 08:39.460
So this supports the bishop and supports Queen A five.

08:39.540 --> 08:41.480
Jack, this bouncy road of a tank.

08:41.900 --> 08:47.090
We have King C eight Rook, AC one check 90 C6 rook f one.

08:47.360 --> 08:56.120
So looking at D7 now Queen A five and now another glorious move Bishop for letting f7 go because the

08:56.120 --> 09:04.250
key idea is Queen D six this battery on the dark squares we do have Queen thanks F seven if Queen F

09:04.250 --> 09:07.730
six we're just taking on D7 and means so Queen thanks.

09:07.730 --> 09:08.180
F seven.

09:08.180 --> 09:09.110
Queen D six.

09:09.110 --> 09:12.380
We have King D eight and now crashing through here.

09:13.670 --> 09:15.200
What you think won't place.

09:17.370 --> 09:18.060
Okay.

09:19.990 --> 09:21.160
Route 66.

09:21.160 --> 09:24.490
We have Bishop tanks, Queen St C6 looking at eight.

09:26.170 --> 09:29.620
And the game actually ended here if.

09:32.020 --> 09:36.460
If queen size for the simple case we have Queen 27 to checkmate.

09:36.790 --> 09:48.550
We're not taking the rook if Rook C eight Bishop G five check and then we end up picking C eight up.

09:48.940 --> 09:50.290
If Queen F five.

09:50.320 --> 09:51.970
Yeah, we're taking on eight.

09:52.270 --> 09:54.460
Queen STS h8 rook up.

09:54.760 --> 09:55.300
No problem.

09:55.300 --> 09:56.380
If Rook seven.

09:56.920 --> 10:00.580
Bishop G five Czech King and Queen eight is checkmate.

10:01.150 --> 10:02.650
So yes, the Smith Board game.

10:02.740 --> 10:06.640
I do have a course on the Smith Moore gambit with many Essman attacking games.

10:06.640 --> 10:11.050
So gambits do facilitate quite often attacking chess.

10:11.200 --> 10:14.320
The notion of sacrifice for the initiative.

10:15.250 --> 10:20.200
The initiative when you get to call all the shots where sometimes the opponent's king is, is precarious

10:20.200 --> 10:20.950
as well.

10:20.980 --> 10:28.540
Ideally, the initiative combined with King safety issues, is particularly dangerous for king attackers.

10:29.140 --> 10:35.000
So yeah, we see this stunning demonstration that the Smith Monroe gambit, by sacrificing a pawn in

10:35.000 --> 10:43.210
the opening, you know, is a kind of gambit which perhaps didn't get as much attention in the romantic

10:43.210 --> 10:46.570
era of chess as the King's Gambit.

10:47.480 --> 10:48.740
All the evidence came in.

10:48.770 --> 10:53.450
But one point about the King's game, it's almost by default that you're playing out in the second move.

10:53.450 --> 10:56.690
So that's very convenient to get to the Evans game.

10:56.690 --> 11:02.450
It is a few moves to get to, but the Sicilian defense didn't have a great reputation.

11:03.760 --> 11:05.250
For for many years.

11:05.580 --> 11:08.130
So it wasn't so frequently he played.

11:08.580 --> 11:12.420
So things like the Smith Ball game that weren't so researched as now.

11:12.840 --> 11:20.970
But yes, when I did the research with the Smith Gambit course, I found, you know, White usually

11:20.970 --> 11:28.500
has more than enough compensation for at least the quality or better in most of the systems that Black

11:28.500 --> 11:29.460
can put up.

11:29.970 --> 11:36.360
So, yes, it's a very, very interesting attacking weapon against the Sicilian defense, the Smith

11:36.360 --> 11:37.140
Monroe gambit.

11:37.440 --> 11:40.060
And Essman has, you know, mayhem in the mirror.

11:40.080 --> 11:43.860
He's actually created a nice book as well and courses on it.

11:43.860 --> 11:46.770
So but you can also check my Smith moral course.

11:46.770 --> 11:55.410
But he's he's the guy, the international master who's a very attacking, dynamic tactical player which

11:55.410 --> 12:00.540
you can see, you know the power of gambits like this absolutely wonderful that you're preparing your

12:00.540 --> 12:07.500
attacks for future games with concrete opening theory and ideas in very, very exciting positions.

12:08.310 --> 12:08.950
Okay.

12:09.060 --> 12:16.980
And with modern engines, we can get more of an objective verdict on such dynamic things and positions.

12:16.980 --> 12:19.170
We can get a much better verdict than ever before.

12:19.570 --> 12:21.360
Okay, So I hope you enjoyed this one.

12:21.540 --> 12:25.650
And maybe check out my Smith Tomorrow course or ESPN's courses.

12:25.650 --> 12:28.640
So the Smith Boro game is a great one for the Gambit here.

12:28.650 --> 12:30.990
Interested in attacking the King?

12:31.020 --> 12:32.580
Okay, that's a much.
