WEBVTT

00:01.110 --> 00:02.040
Hi there.

00:02.160 --> 00:07.950
In this lecture, I'd like to talk about interesting chess quotations which revolve around attacks,

00:07.950 --> 00:13.610
sacrifices and commendations from various world champions and other interesting players.

00:13.620 --> 00:19.350
So Philidor, he wasn't an official world chess champion, but he laid a kind of foundation about the

00:19.350 --> 00:22.140
pawns, calling pawns the sole of the game.

00:22.140 --> 00:24.570
They alone form the attack and the defense.

00:24.570 --> 00:27.450
So he felt like pawns of the soul of chess.

00:28.800 --> 00:35.520
Now, later in the romantic era, out of Anson has a quotation which is basically attack, always attack.

00:35.520 --> 00:37.740
So quite an enthusiast on the attack.

00:38.460 --> 00:43.140
Wilhelm Steinitz, the first official world champion, started to introduce rules about attack.

00:43.170 --> 00:48.210
He said only the player with the initiative has the right to attack.

00:49.110 --> 00:51.210
So the initiative calling the shots.

00:51.240 --> 00:56.520
The opponents, for example, of Paul Morphy, were on the receiving end and they were having to parry

00:56.520 --> 00:58.230
Fritz a lot of the time.

00:58.230 --> 01:01.800
Paul Morphy had the initiative, especially in the open game.

01:02.070 --> 01:03.330
It's very important.

01:04.470 --> 01:10.500
He also said when you have an advantage, you are obliged to attack, otherwise you are endangered to

01:10.500 --> 01:11.670
lose the advantage.

01:11.670 --> 01:13.020
So he really fought.

01:13.020 --> 01:17.280
It was an integral part of the game for converting advantages.

01:17.790 --> 01:23.970
He also said a win by an unsound combination, however showy, fills me with artistic horror.

01:24.000 --> 01:31.230
So yeah, he didn't like and soundness, you know, even if it was seemingly beautiful, if it was unsound.

01:31.230 --> 01:32.880
Technically, he didn't like it.

01:33.660 --> 01:37.260
He also said a sacrifice is best refuted by accepting it.

01:39.960 --> 01:41.570
That can be quite dangerous sometimes.

01:41.580 --> 01:44.220
Sometimes it's bad to ignore it for a moment.

01:44.370 --> 01:46.170
Well, it depends on the situation.

01:46.230 --> 01:51.230
The attack is the process by by means of which you remove obstructions.

01:51.240 --> 01:52.830
So that is something Laskar said.

01:52.830 --> 01:54.930
It's like removing obstructions.

01:54.930 --> 01:58.230
Liberating the pieces seems to be the implication there.

02:00.510 --> 02:03.450
And, you know, maybe it's pawns, maybe it's your own pieces.

02:03.450 --> 02:07.190
It could be just obstructions that your own pieces to get to the opponents.

02:07.200 --> 02:10.530
KING Combination is a soul of chess.

02:10.530 --> 02:16.320
So Alexander Alekhine, as we've seen, really loves his combinations, and he had to work hard, long

02:16.320 --> 02:21.720
and hard to indicate that dangerous delusion that in the bad position, he could always or nearly always

02:21.720 --> 02:26.160
conjure up some unexpected combination to extricate himself from the difficulties.

02:27.090 --> 02:30.840
So, yes, Alekhine is a great basis of this course.

02:30.840 --> 02:37.110
So it's very interesting, just to reiterate his his thoughts here in the context of other people do

02:37.110 --> 02:42.090
not always be thinking of attack Moves that safeguard your position are often far more prudent.

02:42.090 --> 02:47.850
So Aaron Nimzowitsch so safeguarding the position prophylaxis, strengthening the position, it calls

02:47.850 --> 02:49.710
that more prudence than attacking.

02:49.740 --> 02:50.460
He's got a point.

02:50.460 --> 02:56.970
Sometimes it is better to try and reduce the opponent's counterplay, for example, and you know, over

02:56.970 --> 02:59.430
protection of E5 or just restrain the opponent's pieces.

02:59.430 --> 03:03.270
Then, then maybe you can think about the attack later.

03:03.270 --> 03:09.720
So safeguarding the position, no pawn exchanges, no foul opening, no attack.

03:09.720 --> 03:17.790
So he kind of links up the pawns a bit like Philidor, that the pawns actually play a vital role in

03:17.790 --> 03:18.990
attacking potential.

03:19.530 --> 03:22.260
The first essential for an attack is the will to attack.

03:22.260 --> 03:22.860
It's hard to go.

03:22.860 --> 03:23.850
He's pretty witty.

03:23.850 --> 03:25.830
I love go with quotations.

03:25.980 --> 03:28.320
So yes, he has talked about these things.

03:28.320 --> 03:30.840
It's always better to sacrifice your opponent's men.

03:31.500 --> 03:32.460
That's funny.

03:32.910 --> 03:38.310
A queen sacrifice when even when Fatty Elvis always rejoices the heart of the chess lover.

03:39.660 --> 03:43.710
And funny enough, the Queen sacrifice is touched on in a bit by Karpov.

03:43.740 --> 03:44.730
We'll get to that.

03:44.760 --> 03:49.470
So yes, people, even the absolute champions, they love the Queen sacrifice.

03:50.520 --> 03:56.520
So Alekhine's real genius is in the preparation and construction of a position long before combinations

03:56.520 --> 04:00.810
or mating attacks come into consideration at all.

04:00.810 --> 04:03.270
So Max Alwa has said that.

04:03.270 --> 04:08.490
So actually we all kind of trying to tap in in this course to alekhine's real genius.

04:08.880 --> 04:13.800
So in fact, you know, this this is like one of the more important quotes out of all of this.

04:13.800 --> 04:19.260
I know it's in very small font and I'll give you a text file as well.

04:19.260 --> 04:20.910
You can open up to see these.

04:20.910 --> 04:23.040
But yeah, this is what we're examining.

04:23.040 --> 04:28.560
We're examining the real genius of Alexander Alekhine we want to focus in on how did he get these combinations

04:28.560 --> 04:29.790
of making attacks.

04:30.060 --> 04:34.500
It's in the preparation and the construction of a position first.

04:34.500 --> 04:38.310
So what are the ingredients there in that process?

04:38.430 --> 04:42.540
He also botvinnik the different, more champion with opposite kind of bishops.

04:42.540 --> 04:46.260
The attacking side has in effect, an extra piece in the shape of his bishop.

04:46.290 --> 04:52.040
Yeah, this is touching on Bishop without a counterpart, but both sides basically have a bishop, a

04:52.080 --> 04:52.710
counterpart.

04:52.710 --> 04:56.460
So Botvinnik observed that, you know, it's like in effect an extra piece.

04:56.460 --> 04:57.930
They're on different sides of the row.

04:57.930 --> 05:03.570
So if you have got the attack and you have got a different color bishop to the opponent or maybe the

05:03.570 --> 05:08.190
opponent's got annoying, you know, your bishop's kind of a vicious line piece on that side of the

05:08.190 --> 05:08.850
road, so to speak.

05:08.850 --> 05:14.880
You know, that color of squares on the board which don't link with the other kind of so for the line

05:14.880 --> 05:18.840
pieces the bishops in particular, the rooks, of course, can switch the different colors, but the

05:18.840 --> 05:21.480
bishops are confined to one color.

05:22.410 --> 05:31.710
So I will not hide the fact, the fact that I love to hear the spectators reaction after a sacrifice

05:31.710 --> 05:32.790
of a piece of a pawn.

05:32.790 --> 05:35.700
I don't think there is anything bad in such a feeling.

05:35.700 --> 05:40.140
No artist or musician is indifferent to the reactions of the public.

05:40.140 --> 05:41.160
So make out how.

05:41.910 --> 05:47.580
Yeah, he really loves that artistic like or performance effects, you know, from the musician, he

05:47.580 --> 05:49.800
said There are two types of sacrifices, correct ones.

05:49.800 --> 05:53.430
And mine he didn't really didn't mind, you know, his flavor of sacrifice.

05:53.430 --> 05:55.230
If it wasn't completely sound.

05:55.230 --> 06:00.510
He was often introducing great complexity to the possession, which really confused opponents.

06:01.140 --> 06:07.890
So one charming characteristic of many flank attacks I could mention is that they do not very often

06:07.890 --> 06:09.360
need to simplification.

06:09.390 --> 06:15.390
If you attack his parades, there are usually still opportunities left for initiating action in another

06:15.390 --> 06:15.870
sector.

06:15.870 --> 06:16.200
So.

06:16.200 --> 06:20.430
Ben Lawson So he was one of the greats in the Fisher era, obscured by Fisher.

06:20.430 --> 06:22.860
And it's interesting, he's a great attacking player.

06:22.890 --> 06:29.970
Limbs are lost in attack and of course on his one be free with Larsen games brilliant player combinations

06:29.970 --> 06:35.670
with a queen sacrifice are among the most striking and memorable So memorable so Anatoly Karpov expressed

06:35.670 --> 06:38.130
this love of queen sacrifices.

06:39.100 --> 06:39.790
As well then.

06:39.790 --> 06:47.680
So, you know, the queen sacrifice is loved by a kind of Tasca as well as Karpov here, evidently.

06:49.480 --> 06:52.220
So this is another one.

06:52.240 --> 06:55.030
This is by Spassky, for example, Computer defends.

06:55.030 --> 07:00.970
Well, but for humans, it's harder to defend than attack, particularly with the modern time control.

07:01.000 --> 07:07.300
So, yes, the time control, the notions of less time is I've talked about that quite a bit in various

07:07.300 --> 07:15.040
parts of this course and intros that especially in time pressure, if you're on the attack, it's easier

07:15.040 --> 07:16.540
to be on the attack than offense.

07:16.540 --> 07:19.420
One wrong move and you could be, for example, checkmated.

07:21.300 --> 07:26.910
So he also said Spassky also said nowadays the dynamic element is more important in chess.

07:26.910 --> 07:32.040
Players more often sacrifice material to obtain dynamic compensation.

07:32.550 --> 07:36.180
So we're in Spassky again now.

07:36.180 --> 07:38.340
Fischer I had to really squish this.

07:38.340 --> 07:38.820
Sorry.

07:39.360 --> 07:45.340
It says he said, this is not really about King, and he's more of a is very flexible in what he attacks.

07:45.360 --> 07:49.650
I don't recommend trying to cram a lot of opening move variations into your head.

07:49.680 --> 07:56.640
The main idea behind any opening is to get a strong pawn center and give your pieces a lot of scope

07:56.880 --> 08:01.260
so that you cramp your opponent's position and can attack weaknesses in his game.

08:01.260 --> 08:04.710
So he's not talking about the king necessarily just weaknesses in the game.

08:04.740 --> 08:11.700
So the idea of getting flexibility with a strong pawn censor and it's interesting that he notes, it's

08:11.700 --> 08:19.140
almost as if employing occupation is actually a little bit more important than control when he's emphasizing

08:19.620 --> 08:21.060
a strong pawn center there.

08:21.450 --> 08:29.700
But yeah, when you when you do actually occupy the center rather than control it, your pawns are kind

08:29.700 --> 08:33.540
of locking in the opponent's pawns, quite neatly blockading, literally.

08:33.540 --> 08:36.450
So it's actually impossible for the opponent's pawns to move.

08:36.480 --> 08:42.780
One of the little downsides of controlling the center for a fight is that they could still move their

08:42.780 --> 08:43.020
pawn.

08:43.020 --> 08:44.610
In theory, it could be a sacrifice.

08:44.610 --> 08:47.130
So it's a little bit more dangerous sometimes.

08:47.130 --> 08:54.450
But if you've got a strong pawn center, you are completely sometimes locking down the opponent's pawns.

08:54.480 --> 09:01.260
So, okay, so Kasparov indicated, I like to say that the attacker always has the advantage.

09:01.680 --> 09:08.100
And he said attackers may sometimes regret bad moves, but it's much worse to forever regret an opportunity

09:08.100 --> 09:09.640
that you allowed to pass by.

09:09.660 --> 09:14.940
So the bigger opportunity of the attack in general is emphasizing it would be gutting to to miss that

09:14.940 --> 09:15.480
opportunity.

09:15.480 --> 09:19.840
So, as we say, so rare, it's rising staff here.

09:19.860 --> 09:22.230
So, yeah, this is an interesting selection.

09:22.230 --> 09:27.030
So I looked at different world champions and I gathered these together just in case.

09:27.030 --> 09:29.270
There's some very interesting points.

09:29.280 --> 09:30.990
I think they're all pretty interesting.

09:30.990 --> 09:34.830
I really had a hard time trying to remove even one of them.

09:34.880 --> 09:40.440
I kind of like all of them together, and they're a bit in historical order, you know, from, you

09:40.440 --> 09:45.740
know, Philidor, pre romantic era Adolf Andersen, then.

09:45.750 --> 09:50.280
STEIN It's like the crusher of the romantic era of science with the scientific theories about chess.

09:50.280 --> 09:57.120
You're needing to get accumulate advanced years first to have that right to attack, and that's a necessity

09:57.120 --> 09:57.960
to attack.

09:58.590 --> 10:02.880
And then, you know, we're going into the Alekhine era and Nimzowitsch was around the Alekhine era

10:02.880 --> 10:12.110
and Tosca and then, oh, Botvinnik, you know, we're going tell lost around that era.

10:12.120 --> 10:12.870
Karpov.

10:12.870 --> 10:19.290
Kasparov So yeah, it's a bit of a chronology here of these quotations, so I hope you found this interesting.

10:19.290 --> 10:24.450
I thought it'd be just an interesting exercise to check them out and comment on them just briefly.

10:24.750 --> 10:25.590
Okay.

10:26.580 --> 10:32.460
Now of the first official World Chess Women, let's have a look at a concrete game example.

10:33.390 --> 10:40.800
So if you look at Wiki for Steinitz, it's around 1873 that Steinitz had this transformation from an

10:40.800 --> 10:46.410
all out attacking player, for example, like Adolf Andersson, you know, an all out attacking player

10:47.550 --> 10:49.890
to a kind of more positionally, refined player.

10:49.890 --> 10:54.030
And it's almost as if when you attack later, when you've accumulated the advantages, it's it's very,

10:54.030 --> 10:55.860
very natural risk free.

10:56.040 --> 11:04.110
So here Samuel Rosenthal against Wilhelm Steinitz in 1873, the Vienna tournament which Steinitz won

11:04.110 --> 11:08.160
so E4 from Rosenthal and Steinitz played E5.

11:08.160 --> 11:16.830
We have 9c489c69 F3 and now this is one of my systems in online speed chess nowadays.

11:16.830 --> 11:18.450
Funny enough, I like this.

11:18.450 --> 11:22.320
So d4 e tanks, knight tanks D four, Bishop G seven.

11:22.320 --> 11:25.650
So I like to think so, but it has costs associated with it.

11:25.650 --> 11:34.350
Why it could end up hack attacking you with h age five so ge7 we have bishops e4 d six both sides castle

11:34.380 --> 11:36.060
canceled f4.

11:36.060 --> 11:44.190
Now this does lock in the bishop on a free but is kind of dangerous sometimes this F5 we have a five

11:44.190 --> 11:50.640
so that's a cool move driving that bishop to unpin the f7 pawn and now D5 another cool move causing

11:50.640 --> 11:54.690
disruption, making it kind of unlikely that F5 is going to be effective.

11:54.690 --> 11:55.840
So it takes Knight.

11:56.010 --> 12:03.270
So you can see that already White's being positionally outplayed, so you can't really play like this

12:03.900 --> 12:10.320
against a position, a strong player like Steinitz, It looks like, you know, there's a, there's

12:10.320 --> 12:12.060
less harmony in White's position.

12:12.060 --> 12:17.910
This is not a great way of playing attack Knight takes Queen sex and Black's got really active queen

12:17.910 --> 12:20.670
down the center Very nice C free we.

12:21.550 --> 12:22.590
Lot of pressure.

12:23.970 --> 12:26.490
So, yes, an interesting position here.

12:27.900 --> 12:29.640
We have Quincy, too.

12:31.740 --> 12:38.310
And one of the points here of Quincy, too, you look at Black's friend here, it can be on of Bishop

12:38.340 --> 12:41.720
E Ford to get this to avoid losing a bishop on D3.

12:41.730 --> 12:46.830
So we have 94, though, and this is accumulating now.

12:47.250 --> 12:49.080
Advantage Bishop, take C4.

12:49.080 --> 12:50.490
Black has that light squared.

12:50.490 --> 12:52.440
Bishop without a counterpart.

12:52.440 --> 12:59.250
But what was the option if Bishop f2 c5 Bishop e4 Queen D sex.

12:59.670 --> 13:06.090
This actually is about even technically that was an option, but Bishop takes C4 was played so an attacking

13:06.090 --> 13:07.860
ingredient has been handed over.

13:07.860 --> 13:13.410
But maybe there's not really an awareness that this is any sort of advantage and it's kind of hidden

13:13.410 --> 13:15.220
when people talk about the bishop here.

13:15.510 --> 13:20.750
I really like this aspect that this bishop is potentially dangerous online squares, but there's also

13:21.030 --> 13:21.930
the harmony issue.

13:21.930 --> 13:23.760
This bishop is locked in still.

13:23.850 --> 13:31.710
We have Queen F2 C5 Knights driven back B six and this kind of makes sure that Bishop's kind of prisoner

13:31.800 --> 13:34.830
in the position like E5.

13:34.830 --> 13:38.400
So this looks impressive but it can be driven back with F6 later potentially.

13:38.700 --> 13:46.710
Queen now bishop A6 hitting the rook rook f one and the knights driven back to a knight g4 If the knight

13:46.710 --> 13:51.960
went forward, it's going to be trapped with this move, whereas the knight going after that.

13:52.500 --> 13:55.260
So Knight takes we just take it's just trapped.

13:55.260 --> 14:01.080
So the knight goes back, you see H five Knight F2 So it's not just a bishop round counterpart, it's

14:01.080 --> 14:03.720
trying to nullify this knight.

14:03.750 --> 14:05.340
Let's make sure it's not very useful.

14:05.340 --> 14:08.370
So Queen F seven, I know F f5.

14:08.400 --> 14:14.850
So this was actually good preparation for our focus now G5 and the Queen is holding that H five pawn

14:15.330 --> 14:16.920
from from whence queen.

14:17.490 --> 14:22.810
So okay, we have rook had one and now that is a beautiful bishop on diagonal also is great for Bishop

14:22.810 --> 14:30.090
V7 so we've got really a lovely Bishop black counterpart and it makes this accumulating the ingredients

14:30.090 --> 14:33.270
of attack as well, not just particular advantages.

14:33.270 --> 14:35.460
This can be a really good attacking piece.

14:35.460 --> 14:37.200
It's flexibility as well.

14:37.200 --> 14:40.800
Rook D5 That is an interesting move.

14:40.800 --> 14:45.600
More accurate, it seems, as Rook takes D1 and then rook E8, this is actually a more accurate way

14:45.600 --> 14:50.040
of playing things where black is pretty dominant here.

14:50.070 --> 14:58.380
So for example, this position that's pretty dominant, but Rook d5 we have rook takes D5 now, F5 becomes

14:58.380 --> 15:04.770
weak after this, but if H for G4, that Knight's kind of not doing too much Bishop F4 and the rook

15:04.770 --> 15:06.210
can take on F5 here anyway.

15:06.450 --> 15:13.260
So Rook takes D5, Queen takes D5, we have rook de one, so F5 dropping off, this isn't a good thing.

15:13.890 --> 15:21.650
So yeah, it's, it's just been destroyed once attack didn't have a proper foundation and.

15:21.690 --> 15:22.590
And.

15:23.380 --> 15:24.970
It's just been several down now.

15:25.480 --> 15:26.560
It's a horrible position.

15:26.560 --> 15:33.010
So we have Queen C7, but now just Bishop D5, that's a good place for the Bishop interfering with the

15:33.010 --> 15:37.270
rook coming down as well to the seventh rank B frame.

15:37.420 --> 15:48.280
But now Rookie ain't C4 and the bishop actually goes to F7 and we have Bishop C one.

15:48.640 --> 15:57.640
It's too slow to consider coming down to the seventh rank f7 because Rook thinks E3 carries with it

15:57.640 --> 15:59.530
a rookie one checkmate fret.

15:59.890 --> 16:01.240
That's far too slow.

16:01.690 --> 16:04.810
So we have the passive looking Bishop C one.

16:05.110 --> 16:08.770
If Rook e1 Queen two is interesting.

16:08.770 --> 16:13.840
So this position, for example here Black could just simply nab a pawn.

16:13.990 --> 16:17.950
There's no problems here with that pin won't pin down.

16:19.570 --> 16:22.990
It's interesting to note here, you know, Queen C two is one of the better moves.

16:23.110 --> 16:24.650
Rook takes E three fouls.

16:24.670 --> 16:26.800
Actually, this is not a good track.

16:27.490 --> 16:31.690
It will be losing if it does this.

16:31.690 --> 16:32.080
Sure.

16:32.110 --> 16:34.030
Queen B one check and amazing.

16:34.030 --> 16:37.630
But actually, can you see why this isn't a good move?

16:37.720 --> 16:39.670
What does won't play have at some points.

16:42.230 --> 16:42.680
Yeah.

16:42.710 --> 16:47.120
One can find this check to get a key defensive common square.

16:47.690 --> 16:52.720
And then rookie is the best f king H seven white can just take.

16:52.730 --> 16:56.730
And then there's Brook, then there's Queen D one with a winning advantage.

16:56.750 --> 17:03.080
So actually, if we went this way, rookie eight would be forced and we just end up with an equal position

17:03.110 --> 17:03.830
here.

17:04.280 --> 17:05.150
So okay.

17:05.180 --> 17:10.640
Anyway, Bishop's C one we have rookie two, rook have one and now Queen C two.

17:10.670 --> 17:12.760
This is very interesting.

17:12.770 --> 17:14.750
Rook takes eight to was also strong.

17:14.750 --> 17:20.560
So Queen C two is you can see that this bishop here is safeguarding the king as well as other things.

17:20.570 --> 17:20.980
Okay.

17:20.990 --> 17:22.910
This bishop's looking at c four right now.

17:22.910 --> 17:25.610
Queen Geoffrey Queen 62.

17:25.610 --> 17:25.910
But why?

17:25.920 --> 17:27.200
It's really just tied down.

17:27.200 --> 17:31.900
So we have Queen B eight checking H and Queen G three.

17:31.910 --> 17:33.190
Why it's not doing much.

17:33.200 --> 17:36.950
Bishop G six Now the Bishop's helping things potentially a bit more.

17:37.250 --> 17:43.370
H for G four we have 93.

17:46.190 --> 17:50.360
It's a very bad position if King H to Queen B one, for example here.

17:50.360 --> 17:53.480
A5 What is White actually doing after five?

17:54.050 --> 17:56.210
We can actually play F for here.

17:56.480 --> 18:01.100
The point would be, well, it's pretty crushing.

18:01.100 --> 18:07.880
But one of the points for example Bishop thanks for rookie one is strong this position with Bishop D4

18:08.180 --> 18:12.290
and went to the world of pain whereas the knight gain that Bishop's covering that knight squishing that

18:12.290 --> 18:17.750
knight so you see the bishop have really strong here as example.

18:17.750 --> 18:25.550
So anyway Knight defray is playing queen takes B3 losing more material, Queen C seven and just giving

18:25.550 --> 18:32.690
up the pace and the game So White resigns now Yeah just lost the piece for nothing and for example this

18:32.690 --> 18:33.890
could be a quick checkmate.

18:34.490 --> 18:40.280
So the point of this game, Steinitz, out of all of these quotations, he's the first official world

18:40.280 --> 18:42.980
chess chairman which laid down the scientific theory.

18:42.980 --> 18:45.200
So he can't be kind of emphasized enough.

18:45.200 --> 18:46.130
In my view.

18:46.160 --> 18:52.550
He paves the way for solid, accurate, attacking chess based on a good position.

18:52.550 --> 18:57.290
So it's almost as if it's not really going out of your way to attack the opponent's king.

18:57.290 --> 19:04.250
If you've built up solid advantages in the position it's getting, those attacking gradients recognize

19:04.250 --> 19:05.510
them from afar.

19:05.600 --> 19:10.100
If you recognize the attacking ingredients, you might be able to trade off, for example, material

19:10.100 --> 19:12.920
sometimes that a pawn to get a bishop without counterpart.

19:12.920 --> 19:16.400
All of those attacking ingredients mentioned in this course.

19:16.790 --> 19:22.910
You know, sometimes you are doing a trade off between material or pawn structure to invoke them to

19:22.910 --> 19:26.180
amplify the attacking ingredients by here.

19:26.180 --> 19:30.770
Yeah, it just seems, you know, once attack was just crushed, it didn't have to happen.

19:30.950 --> 19:32.420
It didn't have any effect to it.

19:32.810 --> 19:35.190
It's about effective attacking chess.

19:35.190 --> 19:41.300
There's almost we're talking a natural function of your position to attack later if you built up the

19:41.300 --> 19:42.110
advantage.

19:42.440 --> 19:43.010
Okay.

19:43.010 --> 19:48.350
So I hope you enjoyed these quotations and thoughts from great players of the past.

19:49.130 --> 19:54.980
And Todd Scott, of course, if you want very, very good quotations, WITI Tasco is one of the best

19:54.980 --> 19:59.690
guides for quotations in general, one of my favorite guys in chess, even though he wasn't a world

19:59.690 --> 20:00.380
chess champion.

20:00.470 --> 20:03.500
Nimzowitsch another great favorite because of my system.

20:03.500 --> 20:05.120
So you see quotations.

20:05.120 --> 20:11.180
Some here are not from world champions but from players I really kind of admire as well.

20:11.210 --> 20:13.010
Okay, that's very much.
